Surprised this hasn't been posted already. Very good film, true story about a baseball GM Billy Beane of the Oakland A's who's looking for a player recruitment system based on player statistics in order to bring the club success rather than try and compete with the likes of the Yankee's who are financially superior.
I think many on here would empathise with this film because as a club we can relate to the system he was trying to implement; not paying out top dollar contracts on big star players and instead buying underrated players who cost far less and are capable of doing the necessary.
[youtube]AiAHlZVgXjk[/youtube]
Moneyball
Re: Moneyball
I wasn't expecting to enjoy it so much. A very good film, maybe one for the film club
- KingoStarr
- First Night Blues
- Posts: 10962
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:23 pm
- Location: Coventry
Re: Moneyball
Philadelphia Phillies Fo Lyf
Not actually seen the movie though so I'll take a watch
Not actually seen the movie though so I'll take a watch
The 'sburg dynasty is over 3 seasons, 3 division 1 titles.
Re: Moneyball
It's also worth noting that they John W Henry (Liverpool owner) is featured in the film as he's the owner of the Red Sox.
Speaking of Red Sox- I think I'm going to a game in July!
Speaking of Red Sox- I think I'm going to a game in July!
- Donkey Toon
- Croatia (Modric)
- Posts: 8138
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:46 pm
Re: Moneyball
Good film. Watched it last night for the second time and enjoyed it much more second time around.Juliet Papa Golf wrote:It's also worth noting that they John W Henry (Liverpool owner) is featured in the film as he's the owner of the Red Sox.
Speaking of Red Sox- I think I'm going to a game in July!
Find it quite ironic that John Henry seems to have embraced the moneyball philosophy for baseball and yet under his ownership the Dippers splashed crazy money on Carroll, Henderson and Downing and for a few years became the definition of a team that failed to get value for money on transfers. I'm guessing the same level of statistics don't exist for football so he couldn't apply the same approach?
- PepperJack
- Wilson's Loose Tooth
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Moneyball
The 700 levelKingoStarr wrote:Philadelphia Phillies Fo Lyf
Not actually seen the movie though so I'll take a watch
Re: Moneyball
Donkey Toon wrote:Good film. Watched it last night for the second time and enjoyed it much more second time around.Juliet Papa Golf wrote:It's also worth noting that they John W Henry (Liverpool owner) is featured in the film as he's the owner of the Red Sox.
Speaking of Red Sox- I think I'm going to a game in July!
Find it quite ironic that John Henry seems to have embraced the moneyball philosophy for baseball and yet under his ownership the Dippers splashed crazy money on Carroll, Henderson and Downing and for a few years became the definition of a team that failed to get value for money on transfers. I'm guessing the same level of statistics don't exist for football so he couldn't apply the same approach?
Very good point! Obviously they are two completely separate sports and operate much differently in player recruitment. I guess it's probably because Henry was new to the sport, one he was more than likely unfamiliar with and wanted to make his mark by impressing the fans through big spending. Safe to say they haven't done the same since and have signed some tidy players mostly!
-
- Is Shit
- Posts: 25102
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:38 am
Re: Moneyball
Contrary to that, apart from Carroll, Henderson and Downing were both signed based on their stats. I think Downing was the highest cross% so was seen as the ideal man for Carroll and Henderson had a really high chance created, tackles and distance ran per game. I remember Commoli mentioning it once.Donkey Toon wrote:Good film. Watched it last night for the second time and enjoyed it much more second time around.Juliet Papa Golf wrote:It's also worth noting that they John W Henry (Liverpool owner) is featured in the film as he's the owner of the Red Sox.
Speaking of Red Sox- I think I'm going to a game in July!
Find it quite ironic that John Henry seems to have embraced the moneyball philosophy for baseball and yet under his ownership the Dippers splashed crazy money on Carroll, Henderson and Downing and for a few years became the definition of a team that failed to get value for money on transfers. I'm guessing the same level of statistics don't exist for football so he couldn't apply the same approach?
On topic I enjoyed the film a lot.
SpoilerShow
Shame they never won though
" Samaras is a special player." - A. Iniesta