Wolves thread. interested but also terrified
- Colback's Orange Tufts
- USA USA USA (Pulisic)
- Posts: 11946
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
- Location: Near the ducks
Wolves thread. interested but also terrified
Sharing articles no-one reads since 2012
- Colback's Orange Tufts
- USA USA USA (Pulisic)
- Posts: 11946
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
- Location: Near the ducks
- Colback's Orange Tufts
- USA USA USA (Pulisic)
- Posts: 11946
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
- Location: Near the ducks
Re: Wolves match thread
Oh god its Schar in midfield right?
Sharing articles no-one reads since 2012
- originallad
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 4954
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Greater Manchester
Re: Wolves match thread
Any idea what formation we're playing?
- originallad
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 4954
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Greater Manchester
Re: Wolves match thread
Murphy at wing back?
Re: Wolves match thread
Not a clue. Hayden on the bench so presume Schar in midfield for no reason, but no right back. Murphy somewhere, and somehow ASM, Fraser and Almiron. It's either gloriously stupid or stupidly glorious.
I think he might have picked it out of a hat. Is there a goalkeeper?
I think he might have picked it out of a hat. Is there a goalkeeper?
Re: Wolves match thread
OMG it might be the lesser spotted Almiron in CM...
Re: Wolves match thread
Steve Bruce wrote:You wanted wingers? I'll give you f***ing wingers.
-
- Senegal (Aboubakar)
- Posts: 3479
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:07 am
Re: Wolves match thread
The app I use seems to think it's a 4 at the back with Fraser at RB and Schar in CM. Most likely it's five with Fraser or Murphy at right wing back, and Almiron deeper in midfield? Got to love good old square peg round hole Brucey ball tactical masterclass.
Previously CIH/Cabella's Invincible Hair
Re: Wolves match thread
Scharr is in midfield. The only option worse than Shelvey.
Good one Steve.
Good one Steve.
Re: Wolves match thread
This.Colly wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:37 pmNot a clue. Hayden on the bench so presume Schar in midfield for no reason, but no right back. Murphy somewhere, and somehow ASM, Fraser and Almiron. It's either gloriously stupid or stupidly glorious.
I think he might have picked it out of a hat. Is there a goalkeeper?
BUT MY WISH HAS COME TRUE (WELL MOST OF OUR FANS WISHES).. Miggy, Fraser & ASM behind Wilson
Looks ridiculous though.. I'm sure he isn't going to put Murphy as RWB & Schar in central midfield when you have Hayden / Longstaff?
Could either go ridiculously wrong or amazingly well.
Re: Wolves match thread
Can't even put out a coherent lineup
Re: Wolves match thread
<saintmaximin>
<fraser>
<hendrick>
<lewis> <fernandez>
<darlow>
Re: Wolves match thread
Seems like Steve has gone with the classic 3-3-4. All out attack!
Must be going for the rather lose 4-3 than 1-0 approach.
Darlow
Schar Lascelles Fernandez
Murphy ‐------------ Hendricks ------------- Lewis
Fraser Almiron Wilson Maximin
Schar Lascelles Fernandez
Murphy ‐------------ Hendricks ------------- Lewis
Fraser Almiron Wilson Maximin
Must be going for the rather lose 4-3 than 1-0 approach.
Re: Wolves match thread
He's trying to be the English version of Bielsa. I hope..
Re: Wolves match thread
- The Deluded Pablo Diego Jose Francisco
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:08 pm
Re: Wolves match thread
To be honest, it really doesn't matter what team/formation we put out its still going to be the exact same **** performance.
Re: Wolves match thread
To be fair this could be a hilariously different s*** performance.The Deluded Pablo Diego Jose Francisco wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:58 pmTo be honest, it really doesn't matter what team/formation we put out its still going to be the exact same **** performance.