Manquillo Schar Lejeune Lewis
Longstaff Shelvey
Fraser Miggy ASM
Wilson
No Hayden? With those 4 attacking players we need a dedicated DM (Hayden) to shield the back four, make tackles and interceptions with a box-to-box midfielder (Longstaff).. I don't know about Schar / Lejune coming into the team but it's worth a shout but Clark and Fernandez have been solid most times but if you want a nice balance you need a ball-playing CB (Lejune) with a solid destroyer (Fernandez).. that pairing on form could be our best bet but Lascelles is still decent (at times), Clark when called upon is mainly solid & Schar from the 2018-2019 season was quality with his passing, attacking runs & technique, if he can recapture that form then great partner him with Lejune.
Feel especially harsh on Clark tbf, he's been brilliant recently.Sanchino wrote: ↑Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:16 pmNo Hayden? With those 4 attacking players we need a dedicated DM (Hayden) to shield the back four, make tackles and interceptions with a box-to-box midfielder (Longstaff).. I don't know about Schar / Lejune coming into the team but it's worth a shout but Clark and Fernandez have been solid most times but if you want a nice balance you need a ball-playing CB (Lejune) with a solid destroyer (Fernandez).. that pairing on form could be our best bet but Lascelles is still decent (at times), Clark when called upon is mainly solid & Schar from the 2018-2019 season was quality with his passing, attacking runs & technique, if he can recapture that form then great partner him with Lejune.
Ideal starting XI (for me)
Dubra (harsh on Darlow but still think Dubra the better overall keeper)
Manquillo Lejune Fernandez Willems (Jetro).. if we don't get him then Lewis
Hayden Longstaff
Fraser Miggy ASM
Wilson
Not sure how accurate this is but this site still has him down as ankle injury. Could be covid on top of it though.Captain Obvious wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 10:14 amGuessing ASM is one of the players with long covid. Sounds like there’s a couple of guys hit really hard - Bruce quoted as saying they walk for 30mins and are knackered. I know someone who had a reaction like this from Covid and it took them around half a year or so to feel ‘normalish’ and capable of a lengthy walk. There was a few articles on the BBC too about this. Not good news.
I only think it's harsh in the sense I just don't think there's a foul in the box. It's without question a red (whether straight or second yellow) and a free kick, the only argument is whether the foul "continues" into the area and I really don't think "there might be incidental contact with his foot" counts as a continuation of what was previously a shirt pull.Don Sholeone wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:28 amI didnt think the penalty was harsh, Anderson was just dumb, he was clearly trying to bring Wilson down and had 3 goes at doing so, pulled him back twice then clipped his foot. Already on a yellow too so the red was fully deserved. Yes Wilson went down very easy on the last one but Anderson gave him the opportunity on a plate, if advantage wasn't played then the first 2 pull backs were free kicks anyways. It was smart play by Wilson in the end.
Agree. Except I will go further re the inside the box side of the incident. It was a dive. The foul (shirt pull) was committed outside the box but not sufficient to bring him down. What induced him to dive I haven't a clue but it was a clear dive. I didn't even need to see the numerous replays to conclude that but confirm it they did. Fulham woz robbed.Colly wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 12:53 pmI only think it's harsh in the sense I just don't think there's a foul in the box. It's without question a red (whether straight or second yellow) and a free kick, the only argument is whether the foul "continues" into the area and I really don't think "there might be incidental contact with his foot" counts as a continuation of what was previously a shirt pull.Don Sholeone wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:28 amI didnt think the penalty was harsh, Anderson was just dumb, he was clearly trying to bring Wilson down and had 3 goes at doing so, pulled him back twice then clipped his foot. Already on a yellow too so the red was fully deserved. Yes Wilson went down very easy on the last one but Anderson gave him the opportunity on a plate, if advantage wasn't played then the first 2 pull backs were free kicks anyways. It was smart play by Wilson in the end.
See id argue that it was a continuation of the foul, there was no attempt for the ball during the whole phase. There is contact that continues into the box so I think that wipes out any question of contact being incidental. Andersens intent through the whole thing was to impede Wilson.Colly wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 12:53 pmI only think it's harsh in the sense I just don't think there's a foul in the box. It's without question a red (whether straight or second yellow) and a free kick, the only argument is whether the foul "continues" into the area and I really don't think "there might be incidental contact with his foot" counts as a continuation of what was previously a shirt pull.Don Sholeone wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:28 amI didnt think the penalty was harsh, Anderson was just dumb, he was clearly trying to bring Wilson down and had 3 goes at doing so, pulled him back twice then clipped his foot. Already on a yellow too so the red was fully deserved. Yes Wilson went down very easy on the last one but Anderson gave him the opportunity on a plate, if advantage wasn't played then the first 2 pull backs were free kicks anyways. It was smart play by Wilson in the end.
Same. I’d take anyone over Bruce right now
McClaren was better than Bruce, at least we had some possession.