Tino Livramento Deal agreed

User avatar
Tsi
Suisse (topless man)
Suisse (topless man)
Posts: 14109
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:08 pm
Location: Up North

Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Tsi » Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:23 pm

Sky sports
Newcastle United have reached an agreement with Southampton to sign right-back Tino Livramento


footywithuti
Tindall's Hoody
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:52 pm

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by footywithuti » Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:37 pm

Evening everyone, I hope you’re keeping well. Here’s a short video detailing everything you need to know about Tino Livramento in under 3 minutes for those interested. This kid is a heck of a talent and I’m really looking forward to seeing how he gets on at St. James’ Park. As always, I’d be happy to answer any questions you may have, cheers!


MJ91
Wood's Touch
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:32 am

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by MJ91 » Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:46 pm

He is a good player but imo we overpaid a bit...Nonethless we bought the potential so it can explain the ''big'' fee

Don Sholeone
Brazil (Neymar)
Brazil (Neymar)
Posts: 12226
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:41 pm

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Don Sholeone » Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:05 pm

I can't see how the club can talk about us being restricted by FFP when we are just outright overpaying for players we don't really need. The lad is obviously talented but talk of upwards of £40m for him is pretty absurd when there are more important areas to address.

User avatar
bodacious benny
Whiskey Business
Whiskey Business
Posts: 36028
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:18 am

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by bodacious benny » Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:16 pm

Don Sholeone wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:05 pm
I can't see how the club can talk about us being restricted by FFP when we are just outright overpaying for players we don't really need. The lad is obviously talented but talk of upwards of £40m for him is pretty absurd when there are more important areas to address.
We do need someone in that position. What if Trippier gets injured? We've got Manquillo/Krafth who aren't good enough / been injured for a year.

I've read some things that he can play LB too if needed.
I'm the scumbag outlaw. You're the pillar of justice. Neither of us like looking at ourselves in the mirror. Do we have a deal?

User avatar
Colback's Orange Tufts
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
Posts: 11974
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Location: Near the ducks

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Colback's Orange Tufts » Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:28 pm

I too find it odd. We need a centre back much more than full back.
Sharing articles no-one reads since 2012

User avatar
bodacious benny
Whiskey Business
Whiskey Business
Posts: 36028
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:18 am

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by bodacious benny » Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:35 pm

Colback's Orange Tufts wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:28 pm
I too find it odd. We need a centre back much more than full back.
Yes, but Lascelles (or Burn) coming in at CB is stronger than Manquillo/Krafth coming in at RB IMO.

But agree we do need a better quality CB for cover / first team.
I'm the scumbag outlaw. You're the pillar of justice. Neither of us like looking at ourselves in the mirror. Do we have a deal?

Colly
Belgium (Lukaku)
Belgium (Lukaku)
Posts: 8703
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: Billingham

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Colly » Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:41 pm

Bodacious Benny wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:35 pm
Colback's Orange Tufts wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:28 pm
I too find it odd. We need a centre back much more than full back.
Yes, but Lascelles (or Burn) coming in at CB is stronger than Manquillo/Krafth coming in at RB IMO.

But agree we do need a better quality CB for cover / first team.
Disagree with this one, especially at RCB where Burn would be out of place and Lascelles nowhere near good enough. Neither Manquillo or Krafth give you what Trippier does in terms of influence, but both are good enough and the fact that both are still around is strange. Manquillo is surely going out?

User avatar
Sir Bobby
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster
Posts: 3710
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:23 pm

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Sir Bobby » Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:41 pm

Bodacious Benny wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:35 pm
Colback's Orange Tufts wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:28 pm
I too find it odd. We need a centre back much more than full back.
Yes, but Lascelles (or Burn) coming in at CB is stronger than Manquillo/Krafth coming in at RB IMO.

But agree we do need a better quality CB for cover / first team.
Burn and Lascelles coming in at CB are both stronger than Burn starting at LB (where I imagine Livramento will start for us)

User avatar
Tsi
Suisse (topless man)
Suisse (topless man)
Posts: 14109
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:08 pm
Location: Up North

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Tsi » Thu Aug 03, 2023 5:22 pm

Sky saying the fee is £32m

With add ons

User avatar
Tsi
Suisse (topless man)
Suisse (topless man)
Posts: 14109
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:08 pm
Location: Up North

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Tsi » Thu Aug 03, 2023 6:02 pm


Colly
Belgium (Lukaku)
Belgium (Lukaku)
Posts: 8703
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: Billingham

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Colly » Thu Aug 03, 2023 6:16 pm

Slightly weird lineup. Albert's goal against Man Utd was excellent but probably not worth that much of a restructure.

User avatar
Tsi
Suisse (topless man)
Suisse (topless man)
Posts: 14109
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:08 pm
Location: Up North

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Tsi » Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:07 pm

Colly wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 6:16 pm
Slightly weird lineup. Albert's goal against Man Utd was excellent but probably not worth that much of a restructure.
<laugh>

User avatar
beatski
England (Kane)
England (Kane)
Posts: 24191
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:19 pm
Location: The Dangerzone

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by beatski » Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:43 pm

Bodacious Benny wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:16 pm
Don Sholeone wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:05 pm
I can't see how the club can talk about us being restricted by FFP when we are just outright overpaying for players we don't really need. The lad is obviously talented but talk of upwards of £40m for him is pretty absurd when there are more important areas to address.
We do need someone in that position. What if Trippier gets injured? We've got Manquillo/Krafth who aren't good enough / been injured for a year.

I've read some things that he can play LB too if needed.
Personally I thik Maquillo is decent. Cant remember him ever having a stand out bad game. Is he noticably worse than Burn/Targett at LB, who are our starters?


LB is by far the easiest spot in the starting 11 to make a large improvent, and if we dont, im going to be at least a little disappointed with the window

User avatar
ALF
Sleep is for Pussies
Sleep is for Pussies
Posts: 21842
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Kent

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by ALF » Fri Aug 04, 2023 2:23 pm

Colly wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:41 pm
Bodacious Benny wrote:
Thu Aug 03, 2023 3:35 pm


Yes, but Lascelles (or Burn) coming in at CB is stronger than Manquillo/Krafth coming in at RB IMO.

But agree we do need a better quality CB for cover / first team.
Disagree with this one, especially at RCB where Burn would be out of place and Lascelles nowhere near good enough. Neither Manquillo or Krafth give you what Trippier does in terms of influence, but both are good enough and the fact that both are still around is strange. Manquillo is surely going out?
Previously I would have agreed with this, but he was brilliant when he came in against City last season. Very small sample size but everybody else has improved under actual coaching.

User avatar
lassassinblanc
Netherlands (Gini)
Netherlands (Gini)
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:09 am
Location: Stavanger

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by lassassinblanc » Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:33 am

Medical completed announcement soon
I'll Hazard a guess

Colly
Belgium (Lukaku)
Belgium (Lukaku)
Posts: 8703
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: Billingham

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Colly » Tue Aug 08, 2023 9:31 am


User avatar
bodacious benny
Whiskey Business
Whiskey Business
Posts: 36028
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:18 am

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by bodacious benny » Tue Aug 08, 2023 9:34 am

I do think it’s a lot, but if his injury is behind him he can be absolutely class. Can learn from Trippier and has the pace our back line lacks.
I'm the scumbag outlaw. You're the pillar of justice. Neither of us like looking at ourselves in the mirror. Do we have a deal?

User avatar
lassassinblanc
Netherlands (Gini)
Netherlands (Gini)
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:09 am
Location: Stavanger

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by lassassinblanc » Tue Aug 08, 2023 9:49 am

Good signing, I get the worry over the price and his recent injury.

Though what I will say is 1) cruciate injuries aren't as career changing as they once were due to advancements in sports science yes it's a horrible injury but it's no longer a career ending injury 2) He passed his medical so if there were any issues with said knee he wouldn't have.

In terms of the fee yeah it's high but there is definitely some English tax on that. Same with what we paid for Gordon and Barnes
I'll Hazard a guess

Colly
Belgium (Lukaku)
Belgium (Lukaku)
Posts: 8703
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: Billingham

Re: Tino Livramento Deal agreed

Post by Colly » Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:05 am

Still find an odd one, can see him, Trippier or Manquillo playing left back at times this season. If you include Ashby that's 5 right backs.

Post Reply