Man city were charged and fined £35,000 in January for a similar offence but this led to a outcry of being too soft and the FA vowed to overhaul its disciplinary sanctions amid concern about lenient punishments.It is alleged the club failed to ensure its 'club whereabouts' information was accurate on three occasions within 12 months
I'm over Colo wrote:Were the offences by the other clubs for repeated failures like West Ham, or more a one-time thing?
Manchester City broke the Football Association's anti-doping rules three times in less than five months, the governing body has said.
Tsi wrote:I'm over Colo wrote:Were the offences by the other clubs for repeated failures like West Ham, or more a one-time thing?Manchester City broke the Football Association's anti-doping rules three times in less than five months, the governing body has said.
West Ham have been charged in relation to regulation 14 (d) of the FA's anti-doping rules.
The rules state: "It shall be a breach by the club if the information contained in such reports is either initially inaccurate or has not been updated by the club as necessary to ensure it remains accurate."
Breach of this regulation does not constitute an anti-doping rule violation, but instead constitutes misconduct, according to the anti-doping rules.
An orrible bunch of cronuts.Bodacious Benny wrote:West Ham are such an unlikeable club
You get some teams that a lot of other fans don't really mind either way (Swansea, Southampton etc. and even Leicester before and after their success) but I don't think I know any non-West Ham fan that has a good word to say about them.
