Sherlock (BBC)

User avatar
Cal
Denmark (Kasper)
Denmark (Kasper)
Posts: 22043
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:40 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Cal » Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:44 pm

Expecting the return of Sherlock next summer?

Try late 2013. Perhaps even 2014, depending where you live.

Start of production on the third cycle of the fan-adored detective drama has been moved from January to March. Sources say the shift was necessary to accommodate the busy schedules of the show’s breakout stars, Benedict Cumberbatch (who’s in Star Trek 2) and Martin Freeman (starring in The Hobbit).

The BBC has not announced a premiere date for season three, but given that January was previously announced as the start of production, fans hoped to see Holmes and Watson return in the summer. Sources say the BBC will air Sherlock series three in late 2013. PBS has to wait until after the BBC’s window. A PBS spokesperson says Sherlock will air either late 2013 — or early 2014.

The first cycle of Sherlock debuted in the UK in July, 2010. The eagerly anticipated second season premiered last January, with PBS debuting the three 90-minute episodes in May. With its second season cliffhanger and increasing critical acclaim and worldwide buzz, anticipation for the next cycle of Sherlock is stronger than ever. From the BBC’s perspective, however, nothing about its schedule has really changed. Though production is starting slightly later than originally hoped, the company has only previously said the show will run sometime next year and recently hinted that a fall debut is likely.
<wah>

User avatar
beardface
Shola-esque
Shola-esque
Posts: 15697
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by beardface » Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:04 pm

<grim>

User avatar
Lidl
Avoids Death. Until it Matters.
Avoids Death. Until it Matters.
Posts: 15526
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: Lidl

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Lidl » Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:55 pm

<neg>
If This Is How You Folks Make Art, Well That's f***ing Depressing

Get It On My Back You Slag!

User avatar
Mifune
Homeless Spunky Slut
Homeless Spunky Slut
Posts: 15308
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:52 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Mifune » Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:12 am

BBC are s*** <mob>.

User avatar
tomtom94
Forum Legend
Forum Legend
Posts: 5537
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by tomtom94 » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:03 am

Mifune wrote:BBC are s*** <mob>.
They can't help it if Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman are busy <erm>

I don't expect Sherlock to be commissioned beyond series three, as people have said, Cumberbatch and Freeman are too famous and busy now which is a great shame because it's a fantastic series.
History wrought with disease for so long, a nation sleeps tight... the poison carries on!

this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.

With friends like these, who needs herpes?

User avatar
Alfie
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2603
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Alfie » Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:58 pm

Martin Freeman was on something a while back, can't remember what (maybe Graham Norton) and he said that The Hobbit would take at least 18 months (shooting 2 films back to back) so I don't see him doing Sherlock until after that.
And in conclusion, how far had you got through reading this before you realised it was my signature?

User avatar
Mifune
Homeless Spunky Slut
Homeless Spunky Slut
Posts: 15308
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:52 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Mifune » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:11 pm

tomtom94 wrote:
Mifune wrote:BBC are s*** <mob>.
They can't help it if Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman are busy <erm>

I don't expect Sherlock to be commissioned beyond series three, as people have said, Cumberbatch and Freeman are too famous and busy now which is a great shame because it's a fantastic series.
The BBC are s*** <mob>.

User avatar
Cal
Denmark (Kasper)
Denmark (Kasper)
Posts: 22043
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:40 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Cal » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:44 am

Tonight.

Also there's a shitty 7-8 minute teaser somewhere on the BBC site, but it's not worth the watch.

User avatar
Speedo
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Posts: 9478
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: London

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Speedo » Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:33 pm

Cal wrote:Tonight.

Also there's a shitty 7-8 minute teaser somewhere on the BBC site, but it's not worth the watch.
Literally nothing happens. I was so disappointed.
I had the first custom w***

User avatar
Cal
Denmark (Kasper)
Denmark (Kasper)
Posts: 22043
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:40 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Cal » Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:37 pm

Speedo wrote:
Cal wrote:Tonight.

Also there's a shitty 7-8 minute teaser somewhere on the BBC site, but it's not worth the watch.
Literally nothing happens. I was so disappointed.
Do you think he's coming back? There's so much suspense.

User avatar
Speedo
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Posts: 9478
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: London

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Speedo » Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:03 pm

Cal wrote:
Speedo wrote:
Literally nothing happens. I was so disappointed.
Do you think he's coming back? There's so much suspense.
So much suspense. I think it might become a one man show, just Dr Watson being an alcoholic and making increasingly rash decisions and ending up shooting Lestrade.

Actually that sounds quite fun, maybe I should pitch it to the Beeb.
I had the first custom w***

User avatar
beatski
England (Kane)
England (Kane)
Posts: 24186
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:19 pm
Location: The Dangerzone

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by beatski » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:27 pm

<awe>

User avatar
TheLittleGeordie
Incestuous Banter Runner Up
Incestuous Banter Runner Up
Posts: 6115
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:37 pm
Location: The Moldy Loins of Magdor

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by TheLittleGeordie » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:28 pm

Loved all the teasers for how he did <awe>
Like a seahorse in the night, he rides with haste to his beloved's domain.

He is the silent guardian, the practical idealist, the man of peace prepared for war.

He is a Mackem.

User avatar
Speedo
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Not at 66-1, f*** that.
Posts: 9478
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: London

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Speedo » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:35 pm

I thought that was s***. I was so disappointed.
SpoilerShow
The train tunnel thing made no sense. As if the guy with all the maps of the tunnels wouldn't notice the abandoned tunnel when that was exactly what he was looking for.
I had the first custom w***

User avatar
Lidl
Avoids Death. Until it Matters.
Avoids Death. Until it Matters.
Posts: 15526
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: Lidl

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Lidl » Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:33 pm

Speedo wrote:I thought that was s***. I was so disappointed.
SpoilerShow
The train tunnel thing made no sense. As if the guy with all the maps of the tunnels wouldn't notice the abandoned tunnel when that was exactly what he was looking for.
That bit was a bit s*** but I still loved it <awe>
If This Is How You Folks Make Art, Well That's f***ing Depressing

Get It On My Back You Slag!

User avatar
beatski
England (Kane)
England (Kane)
Posts: 24186
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:19 pm
Location: The Dangerzone

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by beatski » Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:36 pm

Speedo wrote:I thought that was s***. I was so disappointed.
SpoilerShow
The train tunnel thing made no sense. As if the guy with all the maps of the tunnels wouldn't notice the abandoned tunnel when that was exactly what he was looking for.
SpoilerShow
or that he wouldnt notice that there was a train carriage missing, despite him noticing that the bloke went missing in the first place...

User avatar
Cal
Denmark (Kasper)
Denmark (Kasper)
Posts: 22043
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:40 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Cal » Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:05 am

He isn't Sherlock, he's not allowed to solve it. <fist> I did like the meta-commentary on the theorising fans though.

User avatar
Colback's Orange Tufts
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
Posts: 11971
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Location: Near the ducks

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Colback's Orange Tufts » Thu Jan 02, 2014 10:37 am

It was fine, just not up there with the better episodes. Lack on an engaging outside character spoiled the episode. But measuring it to other tv, not to the best of Sherlock it came out ok
Sharing articles no-one reads since 2012

User avatar
asbo
Celestron Astromaster
Celestron Astromaster
Posts: 10376
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by asbo » Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:14 pm

Beatski wrote:
Speedo wrote:I thought that was s***. I was so disappointed.
SpoilerShow
The train tunnel thing made no sense. As if the guy with all the maps of the tunnels wouldn't notice the abandoned tunnel when that was exactly what he was looking for.
SpoilerShow
or that he wouldnt notice that there was a train carriage missing, despite him noticing that the bloke went missing in the first place...
SpoilerShow
Yeah this was the most ridiculous thing, he'd obviously studied the footage pretty intently to notice the bloke get on and not get off, but didn't notice an entire carriage disappear. The missing tunnel was bizarre, you'd only have to take a ride down there on a train to see it. And would it even be possible to get the carriage down there? You wouldn't be able to drive a single carriage surely?
I thought it was by far the worst episode of the show so far. The last episode was spoiled by the fact he wasn't actually dead for me, and it wasn't really satisfactorily explained in this one. I think the next two episodes will be back up to standard though. Such a shame that they've pissed an entire third of the series away like that though.

User avatar
Colback's Orange Tufts
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
USA USA USA (Pulisic)
Posts: 11971
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Location: Near the ducks

Re: Sherlock (BBC)

Post by Colback's Orange Tufts » Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:18 pm

AbsolutelyGlorious wrote:
Beatski wrote:
SpoilerShow
or that he wouldnt notice that there was a train carriage missing, despite him noticing that the bloke went missing in the first place...
SpoilerShow
Yeah this was the most ridiculous thing, he'd obviously studied the footage pretty intently to notice the bloke get on and not get off, but didn't notice an entire carriage disappear. The missing tunnel was bizarre, you'd only have to take a ride down there on a train to see it. And would it even be possible to get the carriage down there? You wouldn't be able to drive a single carriage surely?
I thought it was by far the worst episode of the show so far. The last episode was spoiled by the fact he wasn't actually dead for me, and it wasn't really satisfactorily explained in this one. I think the next two episodes will be back up to standard though. Such a shame that they've pissed an entire third of the series away like that though.
Worse than the silly 'Hound' one? <scratch>
Sharing articles no-one reads since 2012

Post Reply