Ramone wrote:Have you ever considered that you might be completely insane?
You are talking nonsense without any factual or scientific evidence to back it up. I admit your graciousness and humbleness makes a nice break from the usual conspiracy theorist, but you are still just as crazy.
I could very well be insane. We all could but not know it. I mean, what is sane?
I do admit that I'm a thinker and I have very little trust in a lot of things given out by the media. It's all borne from looking into what we have had to believe in the past. Things that don't ring true and look to be what they are, which is, at best, stretching the truth and at worst, downright misinformation and lies.
I understand that everyone thinks differently and most just accept what they are told. It doesn't mean that it's true, though.
The natural reaction of anyone that goes with the mainstream flow, is to dismiss any other persons thoughts if they go against that and the usual, "you are insane or you're a crazy tin foil hat nutter." I well understand this and I'm happy to be thought of as that and take no offence to it, because, after all, I am questioning stuff against the general grain.
The thing is though, I'm not doing it in the streets or running into buildings shouting, " we are being lied to" or anything like that and I don't even argue any of it in pubs or whatever, because I'm well aware that quite a lot of people get hot under the collar and infuriated when debates don't go the way they want them to, so I don't get into any of it, because it becomes silly.
It's why I don't argue religion in depth, or politics, because it ends up in arguments with people getting worked up over something they have no control over.
That's why it's better to put your thoughts onto paper or in type, like on forums or whatever, because people can debate it and get irate if they want but no harm is done.
I mean, you say I'm talking nonsense without any evidence to back it up but where is the direct evidence to back up what we have been simply told?
Of course, it's easy to say that it's in books and everyone knows this and that is correct but where is the actual evidence that we can physically view, so that we can say for certain it's all correct.
Video can be manipulated, so can books. So just using direct, physical evidence, what tells you that the Earth is a rotating globe?