Re: What would win a fight between a gorilla and a grizzly b
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:26 pm
Hippos are fat cunts as wellAcid Hippo wrote:Hippo always wins
Newcastle United Fans' Forum & Fansite
https://toonforum.co.uk/
Hippos are fat cunts as wellAcid Hippo wrote:Hippo always wins
Ramone wrote:Hippos are fat cunts as wellAcid Hippo wrote:Hippo always wins
Acid Hippo wrote:Hippo always wins
Here, one single hippo defeats almost a dozen tigers, simultaneously.Duke wrote:A tiger could beat a hippo.
Right, they're lions, even more dangerous than tigers thus making the hippo even more bad ass.Duke wrote:Those aren't tigers .
Duke wrote:No they aren't. Lions are nowhere near as strong or heavy and they fight in packs. And those were all females.
A tiger would beat a lion every time. They've been known to hunt rhinos and regularly take down massive buffalo.
Adult male lions have been know to kill elephants single handed.Duke wrote:No they aren't. Lions are nowhere near as strong or heavy and they fight in packs. And those were all females.
A tiger would beat a lion every time. They've been known to hunt rhinos and regularly take down massive buffalo.
Then a tiger could do it easier because they're basically lions only way better in every way. Romans used to pit tigers against lions and the tigers always won easily (supposedly)Pretty Terrible Attacking Options wrote:Adult male lions have been know to kill elephants single handed.Duke wrote:No they aren't. Lions are nowhere near as strong or heavy and they fight in packs. And those were all females.
A tiger would beat a lion every time. They've been known to hunt rhinos and regularly take down massive buffalo.
Tiger swipe to the face.Although lions and tigers can be kept together in harmony in captivity,[33] conflicts between the two species in captivity ending up in fatalities have also been recorded. The most recent account of a fight in captivity happened on March 2011, where a tiger at the Ankara Zoo attacked a lion through its enclosure and killed the lion with a single paw swipe.
A tiger in chains can even beat a lion , mental.At the Coney Island animal show in 1909, a male tiger killed a male lion. During the performance, a performing lion attacked a chained tiger by leaping through the air, landing on the tiger's back. Though hampered by the heavy neck chain fastened to the iron bars of the arena, the tiger was more than a match for the lion and mangled the lion to death.
The tiger was chained to something though? Would be like having to fight with one arm tied behind your back.Pretty Terrible Attacking Options wrote:I imagine the "heavy neck chain" was more of an advantage than a hindrance. The lion would go for the throat trying to choke the tiger, the chain would protect it.
Only if the fight was the first one to touch the other person's hand.Iron Mikes Tiny Eyes wrote:The tiger was chained to something though? Would be like having to fight with one arm tied behind your back.Pretty Terrible Attacking Options wrote:I imagine the "heavy neck chain" was more of an advantage than a hindrance. The lion would go for the throat trying to choke the tiger, the chain would protect it.